At the blazing apogee of the Second World War, a poignant essay on the embattled life of refugees and immigrants was published in an obscure 1943 journal. Written by Hannah Arendt, the German-Jewish philosopher and political theorist, and, by then, embittered refugee, the essay closed with the words: ldquoThe comity of European peoples went to pieces when, and because, it allowed its weakest member to be excluded and persecuted.rdquo
Arendt#8217s message was soberingly simple: Targeting a vulnerable group is the start of unraveling processes that bring greater and far-reaching ruin.
This year, Denmarkrsquos xenophobia and move to the right has entered frighteningly new territory to supposedly prevent immigrants forming a ldquoparallel society.rdquo Let#8217s not forget that Denmark already has the Bohemian autonomous Christianiamdashwhich has caused decades of headaches for the Danish government but whose inhabitants are still less stigmatized than immigrants.
Among the many changes, children from #8220ghetto#8221 areasmdashwhere more than 50% of the population are non-Western immigrants, mainly Muslimsmdashwill have to attend obligatory daycare for 25 hours or more a week from the age of 1, so that they learn ldquoDanish valuesrdquo and traditions, like Christmas and Easter. A law under consideration would impose a four-year prison sentence for parents who commit ldquore-education tripsrdquomdashsending their children on ldquoextendedrdquo visits to the parentrsquos country of origin.The Brief Newsletter Sign up to receive the top stories you need to know right now. View Sample Sign Up Now
The legislation reads like a 19th century missionary enterprise, a colonial experiment to civilize the brown folks.
The peril is that this form of divisive politics will seep deeper into the tapestry of the illiberal anti-immigrant pan-European movement. Denmark is not just setting a precedent; it is sparking a game of one-upmanship in the performance of transnational bigotry.
If immigrants fully ldquoassimilatedrdquo or vanished from the land, then the logic might follow the xenophobic movements would close shop and populist parties would scale back their rhetoric and shift policies to mundane domestic affairs. That rarely happens.
Such movements and parties stake their existential politics on discriminatory and exclusionary practices (despite the claim of inclusionary intentions of wanting to assimilate the immigrants) which are then further reignited along election cycles. Unabashed political interests, not humane social policy, is what matters to them. (责任编辑：东升彩票官网平台) 本文地址：http://www.npohm21.com/yule/zimeiti/201908/2337.html